Structural Functionalism (M N Srinivas)
Relevant for sociology optional Paper- 2 (Unit- 11 : Introducing Indian Society)
The study of Indian society has been shaped by a number of different perspectives and approaches. One of the most influential of these is structural functionalism, which was developed by M.N. Srinivas. This approach views Indian society as a complex system composed of different parts that work together to maintain social order and stability. In this essay, we will examine Srinivas’s perspective on the study of Indian society, his approach to structural functionalism, and the impact of his work on the field of sociology.
Srinivas’s perspective on the study of Indian society was shaped by his belief that Indian society was a unique and complex system that required a new approach to understand it. He argued that Western theories of sociology, which were developed in the context of European societies, were not applicable to India. Instead, he believed that Indian society required a new framework that took into account its unique cultural and historical context.
Srinivas’s approach to structural functionalism was based on the idea that Indian society was composed of different parts, each of which had a specific function to perform. He argued that these parts were interdependent and that they worked together to maintain social order and stability. He also believed that changes in one part of the system could have a ripple effect throughout the rest of the system, leading to changes in social structure and function.
One of the key themes in Srinivas’s work was the concept of the “dominant caste.” He argued that caste was not simply a social hierarchy, but was also a system of power and dominance. He believed that certain castes, which he referred to as “dominant castes,” held a disproportionate amount of power and influence in Indian society. These dominant castes used their power to maintain their position in society and to ensure that their interests were protected.
Srinivas’s work on the dominant caste has been both praised and criticized. Some scholars have argued that his concept of the dominant caste is too simplistic and fails to capture the complexity and diversity of Indian society. Others have criticized him for his focus on caste, arguing that he ignored other important factors, such as religion, language, and ethnicity.
Despite these criticisms, Srinivas’s work had a significant impact on the field of sociology. His approach to structural functionalism provided a new framework for understanding Indian society that took into account its unique cultural and historical context. His work on the dominant caste helped to popularize the study of caste and provided a foundation for further research in this area.
In conclusion, M.N. Srinivas’s perspective on the study of Indian society has had a significant impact on the field of sociology. His approach to structural functionalism provided a new framework for understanding Indian society that took into account its unique cultural and historical context. While his work on the dominant caste has been both praised and criticized, it helped to popularize the study of caste and provided a foundation for further research in this area. Overall, Srinivas’s contributions to the field of sociology have been significant and continue to influence scholars today.
For more such free UPSC notes, Articles, News & Views Join our Telegram Channel. https://t.me/triumphias
Click the link below to see the details about the UPSC – Civils courses offered by Triumph IAS. https://triumphias.com/pages-all-courses.php