Perspective on The Study of Caste System: GS Ghurye, M N Srinivas, Louis Dumont, Andre Beteille
Relevant for sociology optional Paper- 2 (Unit- 12 : Social Structure)
The caste system is a complex and multifaceted social structure that has been present in India for thousands of years. Over time, many scholars have attempted to study and understand the caste system from various perspectives. In this essay, we will take a look at the perspectives of four prominent scholars who have made significant contributions to the study of the caste system: GS Ghurye, M N Srinivas, Louis Dumont, and Andre Beteille.
GS Ghurye was one of the earliest and most influential scholars to study the caste system in India. He believed that the caste system was a unique feature of Indian society and that it was responsible for the country’s stability and continuity. Ghurye saw the caste system as a system of social stratification that was based on birth, occupation, and status. According to him, each caste had its own customs, traditions, and values, which were passed down from generation to generation. He argued that the caste system was a necessary component of Hinduism and that it was integral to the Indian way of life.
In contrast to Ghurye, M N Srinivas took a more critical approach to the study of the caste system. Srinivas was interested in understanding how the caste system affected the lives of individuals and communities. He believed that the caste system created rigid social boundaries that made it difficult for individuals to move up or down the social ladder. Srinivas argued that the caste system was responsible for perpetuating inequality and oppression in Indian society. He also studied the concept of “dominant caste,” which refers to the caste that holds the most power and influence in a particular region. Srinivas argued that dominant castes were able to maintain their power through a variety of means, including economic, political, and social control.
Louis Dumont, a French anthropologist, also studied the caste system in India. Dumont was interested in the philosophical and religious aspects of the caste system. He argued that the caste system was based on a hierarchical ordering of society that was rooted in the Hindu concept of dharma, or duty. According to Dumont, each caste had its own set of duties and obligations, which were determined by its position in the social hierarchy. He believed that the caste system was a reflection of the larger Hindu worldview, which emphasized the importance of order, stability, and hierarchy.
Finally, Andre Beteille studied the caste system from a sociological perspective. Beteille was interested in understanding how the caste system functioned in modern India, particularly in the context of social change and economic development. He argued that the caste system was not a static or unchanging institution, but rather a dynamic system that was constantly evolving in response to social, economic, and political changes. Beteille also studied the relationship between caste and class, arguing that the two were not always synonymous and that individuals could move between castes and classes over time.
Overall, these four scholars offer unique and valuable perspectives on the study of the caste system in India. While Ghurye and Dumont emphasized the cultural and religious aspects of the caste system, Srinivas and Beteille focused more on the social and economic implications of caste. By studying the caste system from a variety of perspectives, we can gain a deeper understanding of its complexities and nuances, and work towards creating a more just and equitable society for all.
For more such free UPSC notes, Articles, News & Views Join our Telegram Channel. https://t.me/triumphias
Click the link below to see the details about the UPSC – Civils courses offered by Triumph IAS. https://triumphias.com/pages-all-courses.php